Erwin Panofsky (1892-1968), Meaning in the Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History
(Garden City: Doubleday Anchor Books, 1955), pp. 24-25 (footnote omitted):
To grasp reality we have to detach ourselves from the present.
Philosophy and mathematics do this by building systems
in a medium which is by definition not subject to time. Natural
science and the humanities do it by creating those spatio-temporal
structures which I have called the "cosmos of nature"
and the "cosmos of culture." And here we touch upon what is
perhaps the most fundamental difference between the humanities
and the natural sciences. Natural science observes the
time-bound processes of nature and tries to apprehend the
timeless laws according to which they unfold. Physical observation
is only possible where something "happens," that is,
where a change occurs or is made to occur by way of experiment.
And it is these changes which are finally symbolized by
mathematical formulae. The humanities, on the other hand,
are not faced by the task of arresting what otherwise would
slip away, but of enlivening what otherwise would remain
dead. Instead of dealing with temporal phenomena, and causing
time to stop, they penetrate into a region where time has
stopped of its own accord, and try to reactivate it. Gazing as
they do at those frozen, stationary records of which I have
said that they "emerge from the stream of time," the humanities
endeavor to capture the processes in the course of which
those records were produced and became what they are.
In thus endowing static records with dynamic life, instead
of reducing transitory events to static laws, the humanities do
not conflict with, but complement, the natural sciences. In
fact these two presuppose and demand each other. Science—here understood in the true sense of the term, namely, as a
serene and self-dependent pursuit of knowledge, not as something
subservient to "practical" ends—and the humanities are
sisters, brought forth as they are by that movement which has
rightly been called the discovery (or, in a larger historical
perspective, rediscovery) of both the world and man. And as
they were born and reborn together, they will also die and be
resurrected together if destiny so wills. If the anthropocratic
civilization of the Renaissance is headed, as it seems to be,
for a "Middle Ages in reverse"—a satanocracy as opposed to
the mediaeval theocracy—not only the humanities but also the
natural sciences, as we know them, will disappear, and nothing
will be left but what serves the dictates of the subhuman.
But even this will not mean the end of humanism. Prometheus
could be bound and tortured, but the fire lit by his torch could
not be extinguished.